Andersen cash flow to debt ratio of 40.09% indicates that the company generates enough cash to cover its debts. This level indicates strong financial health.

Andersen's free cash flow has increased 20.76% from $143.72M last year to $173.56M, signaling increasing performance

Andersen's debt to equity ratio is 15.64, which means that the company's assets are unhealthy financed, signaling financial risk. READ MORE: A ratio over 0.60 means the company finances its assets with debt, signaling financial risk. If ratio is negative, the company spent its own equity and risks bankruptcy

Andersen's debt has increased relative to shareholder equity from 0.55 last year to 15.64 today, signaling weakened financials

Andersen has negative EBITDA, making leverage ratio unreliable

Andersen earns at least as much interest as it pays. Interest obligations are fully covered.

Andersen's profit margin has decreased (-132.64%) in the last year from 18.43% to -6.01%, signaling decreasing performance

Andersen's short-term assets of $412.04M exceed its short-term liabilities of $195.81M

Andersen's return on assets of 0.00% is lower than the 5.00% threshold, indicating inefficient asset utilization

Andersen's return on equity of -239.52%, is lower than 15.00%, indicating bad performance

Andersen's operating cash flow is lower than its net income, indicating that earnings may not be fully backed by cash generation

Andersen had positive net income in only 2.00 out of 5 years, indicating unstable earnings

Andersen has positive free cash flow, indicating the company generates cash after capital expenditures

Andersen has a free cash flow yield of 3.60%, which is above the 2.00% threshold, indicating strong cash generation relative to market value

Andersen's yearly earnings has decreased -101.72% since last year from $134.80M to $-2.32M, signaling decreasing performance

Andersen's yearly revenue has increased 14.64% since last year from $731.59M to $838.69M, signaling increasing performance

ROIC 6.93% (Source: FMP key-metrics). In the 5–10% partial-credit band. Score: 1 of 2. This band sits within the typical US weighted-average cost of capital range. Methodology choice can change the conclusion: under FMP's invested-capital definition the company is at or near its cost of capital; under narrower operating-capital definitions the same company may score higher. Invested capital here includes equity, non-current liabilities, and short-term debt. Cash is not subtracted. See methodology.

Andersen has insufficient revenue history to calculate 3-year revenue CAGR.

Andersen had revenue growth in only 2.00 out of 5 years, indicating inconsistent revenue performance

Andersen had positive ROE in only 2.00 out of 5 years, indicating inconsistent returns on equity

Andersen has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

Andersen has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Andersen is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 0.00 based on EBITDA multiple model

Andersen has negative or missing EBITDA, making EV/EBITDA ratio unreliable

Andersen has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

Andersen has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Andersen has negative shareholder equity; price-to-book is not meaningful and the check fails

Andersen has a price-to-sales ratio of 0.62x, which is below the 8.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its revenue