Ballard Power Systems Inc. cash flow to debt ratio of -258.60% indicates that the company cannot generate enough cash to cover its debt over time. This level indicates weak financial health.

Ballard Power Systems Inc.'s free cash flow has increased -50.51% from $-135.72M last year to $-67.17M, signaling increasing performance

Ballard Power Systems Inc.'s debt to equity ratio is 0.04, which means that the company's assets are healthy financed, signaling financial stability. READ MORE: A ratio under 0.60 means the company finances its assets with own equity, signaling financial stability and good management.

Ballard Power Systems Inc.'s debt has increased relative to shareholder equity from 0.04 last year to 0.04 today, signaling weakened financials

Ballard Power Systems Inc. has negative EBITDA, making leverage ratio unreliable

Ballard Power Systems Inc. earns at least as much interest as it pays. Interest obligations are fully covered.

Ballard Power Systems Inc.'s profit margin has increased (-83.10%) in the last year from -464.99% to -78.60%, signaling increasing performance

Ballard Power Systems Inc.'s short-term assets of $600.34M exceed its short-term liabilities of $60.88M

Ballard Power Systems Inc.'s return on assets of 0.00% is lower than the 5.00% threshold, indicating inefficient asset utilization

Ballard Power Systems Inc.'s return on equity of -13.49%, is lower than 15.00%, indicating bad performance

Ballard Power Systems Inc.'s operating cash flow is lower than its net income, indicating that earnings may not be fully backed by cash generation

Ballard Power Systems Inc. had positive net income in only 0.00 out of 5 years, indicating unstable earnings

Ballard Power Systems Inc. has negative free cash flow, indicating the company is burning cash rather than generating it

Ballard Power Systems Inc. has negative free cash flow, indicating cash burn

Ballard Power Systems Inc.'s yearly earnings has increased -71.47% since last year from $-324.25M to $-92.49M, signaling increasing performance

Ballard Power Systems Inc.'s yearly revenue has increased 45.04% since last year from $69.73M to $101.14M, signaling increasing performance

ROIC -14.38% (Source: FMP key-metrics). Below the 5% partial-credit threshold. Score: 0 of 2. The 5% and 10% cutoffs anchor to typical US weighted-average cost of capital. Below 5% indicates the company is not generating returns above its likely cost of capital under this definition of invested capital. Invested capital here includes equity, non-current liabilities (pension obligations, deferred taxes, lease obligations), and short-term debt. Cash is not subtracted. Companies with substantial float, lease portfolios, or cash holdings will score lower under this definition than under narrower operating-capital definitions. See methodology.

Ballard Power Systems Inc.'s 3-year revenue CAGR of 6.47% is positive, indicating growing revenue over the past 3 years

Ballard Power Systems Inc. had revenue growth in 3.00 out of 5 years, indicating consistent revenue performance

Ballard Power Systems Inc. had positive ROE in only 0.00 out of 5 years, indicating inconsistent returns on equity

Ballard Power Systems Inc. has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

Ballard Power Systems Inc. has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Ballard Power Systems Inc. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 0.00 based on EBITDA multiple model

Ballard Power Systems Inc. has negative or missing EBITDA, making EV/EBITDA ratio unreliable

Ballard Power Systems Inc. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of -3.57 based on Earnings Fair Value model

Ballard Power Systems Inc. has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Ballard Power Systems Inc. has a price-to-book ratio of 1.55x, which is below the 5.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its book value

Ballard Power Systems Inc. has a price-to-sales ratio of 8.64x, which exceeds the 8.00x threshold, indicating the stock may be overvalued relative to its revenue