Burford Capital Limited cash flow to debt ratio of -1.35% indicates that the company cannot generate enough cash to cover its debt over time. This level indicates weak financial health.

Burford Capital Limited's free cash flow has decreased 113.56% from $216.06M last year to $-29.30M, signaling decreasing performance

Burford Capital Limited's debt to equity ratio is 2.95, which means that the company's assets are unhealthy financed, signaling financial risk.

Burford Capital Limited's debt has increased relative to shareholder equity from 0.74 last year to 2.95 today, signaling weakened financials

Burford Capital Limited has a net debt to EBITDA ratio of 17.83x, which exceeds the 3.00x threshold, indicating high leverage and potential financial risk

Burford Capital Limited's interest coverage ratio is -17.26, which means that the company struggles to meet interest obligations, signaling financial risk.

Burford Capital Limited's profit margin was 31.02% last year and is 106.35% this year, signaling increasing performance

Burford Capital Limited's short-term assets of $655.92M exceed its short-term liabilities of $221.97M

Burford Capital Limited's return on assets of -38.60% is lower than the 5.00% threshold, indicating inefficient asset utilization

Burford Capital Limited's return on equity of -99.46%, is lower than 15.00%, indicating bad performance

Burford Capital Limited's operating cash flow is lower than its net income, indicating that earnings may not be fully backed by cash generation

Burford Capital Limited had positive net income in 4 out of 5 years, indicating stable and consistent earnings

Burford Capital Limited has negative free cash flow, indicating the company is burning cash rather than generating it

Burford Capital Limited has negative free cash flow, indicating cash burn

Burford Capital Limited's yearly earnings has decreased 57.28% since last year from $146.48M to $62.57M, signaling decreasing performance

Burford Capital Limited's yearly revenue has decreased 26.40% since last year from $561.67M to $413.36M, signaling decreasing performance

ROIC -205.66% (Source: FMP key-metrics). Below the 5% partial-credit threshold. Score: 0 of 2. The 5% and 10% cutoffs anchor to typical US weighted-average cost of capital. Below 5% indicates the company is not generating returns above its likely cost of capital under this definition of invested capital. Invested capital here includes equity, non-current liabilities (pension obligations, deferred taxes, lease obligations), and short-term debt. Cash is not subtracted. Companies with substantial float, lease portfolios, or cash holdings will score lower under this definition than under narrower operating-capital definitions. See methodology.

Burford Capital Limited's 3-year revenue CAGR of 7.89% is positive, indicating growing revenue over the past 3 years

Burford Capital Limited had revenue growth in only 2 out of 5 years, indicating inconsistent revenue performance

Burford Capital Limited had positive ROE in 4 out of 5 years, indicating consistent and reliable returns on equity

Burford Capital Limited has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

Burford Capital Limited has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Burford Capital Limited is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 0.00 based on Base EBITDA Valuation model

Burford Capital Limited has an EV/EBITDA ratio of 28.08x, which exceeds the 20.00x threshold, indicating the stock may be overvalued relative to its operating earnings

Burford Capital Limited is undervalued relative to its fair value price of 6.18 based on Base Earnings Fair Value model

Burford Capital Limited's earnings growth over the measurement period is negative; the PEG ratio is not meaningful and the check fails.

Burford Capital Limited has a price-to-book ratio of 0.59x, which is below the 5.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its book value

Burford Capital Limited has a price-to-sales ratio of 999.00x, which exceeds the 8.00x threshold, indicating the stock may be overvalued relative to its revenue