Hut 8 Corp. cash flow to debt ratio of -32.43% indicates that the company cannot generate enough cash to cover its debt over time. This level indicates weak financial health.

Hut 8 Corp.'s free cash flow has decreased 2.78K% from $-27.30M last year to $-787.31M, signaling decreasing performance

Hut 8 Corp.'s debt to equity ratio is 0.31, which means that the company's assets are healthy financed, signaling financial stability. READ MORE: A ratio under 0.60 means the company finances its assets with own equity, signaling financial stability and good management.

Hut 8 Corp.'s debt has decreased relative to shareholder equity from 0.32 last year to 0.31 today, signaling strengthened financials

Hut 8 Corp. has negative EBITDA, making leverage ratio unreliable

Hut 8 Corp.'s interest coverage ratio of 4.93 indicates that earnings with good margin can cover interest payments on company debt

Hut 8 Corp.'s profit margin has decreased (-153.71%) in the last year from 204.38% to -109.77%, signaling decreasing performance

Hut 8 Corp.'s short-term assets of $408.18M exceed its short-term liabilities of $375.58M

Hut 8 Corp.'s return on assets of 0.00% is lower than the 5.00% threshold, indicating inefficient asset utilization

Hut 8 Corp.'s return on equity of -20.57%, is lower than 15.00%, indicating bad performance

Hut 8 Corp.'s operating cash flow is lower than its net income, indicating that earnings may not be fully backed by cash generation

Hut 8 Corp. had positive net income in only 2.00 out of 5 years, indicating unstable earnings

Hut 8 Corp. has negative free cash flow, indicating the company is burning cash rather than generating it

Hut 8 Corp. has negative free cash flow, indicating cash burn

Hut 8 Corp.'s yearly earnings has decreased -168.14% since last year from $331.88M to $-226.15M, signaling decreasing performance

Hut 8 Corp.'s yearly revenue has increased 44.79% since last year from $162.38M to $235.12M, signaling increasing performance

ROIC 5.01% (Source: FMP key-metrics). In the 5–10% partial-credit band. Score: 1 of 2. This band sits within the typical US weighted-average cost of capital range. Methodology choice can change the conclusion: under FMP's invested-capital definition the company is at or near its cost of capital; under narrower operating-capital definitions the same company may score higher. Invested capital here includes equity, non-current liabilities, and short-term debt. Cash is not subtracted. See methodology.

Hut 8 Corp.'s 3-year revenue CAGR of -38.70% is negative, indicating declining revenue over the past 3 years

Hut 8 Corp. had revenue growth in 3.00 out of 5 years, indicating consistent revenue performance

Hut 8 Corp. had positive ROE in only 2.00 out of 5 years, indicating inconsistent returns on equity

Hut 8 Corp. has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

Hut 8 Corp. has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Hut 8 Corp. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 2.97 based on EBITDA multiple model

Hut 8 Corp. has negative or missing EBITDA, making EV/EBITDA ratio unreliable

Hut 8 Corp. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of -0.89 based on Earnings Fair Value model

Hut 8 Corp. has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Hut 8 Corp. has a price-to-book ratio of 6.46x, which exceeds the 5.00x threshold, indicating the stock may be overvalued relative to its book value

Hut 8 Corp. has a price-to-sales ratio of 38.38x, which exceeds the 8.00x threshold, indicating the stock may be overvalued relative to its revenue