Knife River Corporation cash flow to debt ratio of 22.19% indicates that the company cannot generate enough cash to cover its debt over time. This level indicates weak financial health.

Knife River Corporation's free cash flow has decreased -146.43% from $149.90M last year to $-69.60M, signaling decreasing performance

Knife River Corporation's debt to equity ratio is 0.95, which means that the company's assets are unhealthy financed, signaling financial risk. READ MORE: A ratio over 0.60 means the company finances its assets with debt, signaling financial risk. If ratio is negative, the company spent its own equity and risks bankruptcy

Knife River Corporation's debt has increased relative to shareholder equity from 0.49 last year to 0.95 today, signaling weakened financials

Knife River Corporation has a net debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.31x, which is below the 3.00x threshold, indicating healthy leverage and financial stability

Knife River Corporation's interest coverage ratio of 3.25 indicates that earnings with margin can cover interest payments on company debt

Knife River Corporation's profit margin has decreased (-34.22%) in the last year from 6.96% to 4.58%, signaling decreasing performance

Knife River Corporation's short-term assets of $960.90M exceed its short-term liabilities of $378.00M

Knife River Corporation's return on assets of 3.84% is lower than the 5.00% threshold, indicating inefficient asset utilization

Knife River Corporation's return on equity of 9.35%, is lower than 15.00%, indicating bad performance

Knife River Corporation's operating cash flow exceeds its net income, indicating high-quality earnings backed by actual cash generation

Knife River Corporation had positive net income in 5.00 out of 5 years, indicating stable and consistent earnings

Knife River Corporation has negative free cash flow, indicating the company is burning cash rather than generating it

Knife River Corporation has negative free cash flow, indicating cash burn

Knife River Corporation's yearly earnings has decreased -22.10% since last year from $201.68M to $157.10M, signaling decreasing performance

Knife River Corporation's yearly revenue has increased 8.52% since last year from $2.90G to $3.15G, signaling increasing performance

ROIC 5.99% (Source: FMP key-metrics). In the 5–10% partial-credit band. Score: 1 of 2. This band sits within the typical US weighted-average cost of capital range. Methodology choice can change the conclusion: under FMP's invested-capital definition the company is at or near its cost of capital; under narrower operating-capital definitions the same company may score higher. Invested capital here includes equity, non-current liabilities, and short-term debt. Cash is not subtracted. See methodology.

Knife River Corporation's 3-year revenue CAGR of 7.47% is positive, indicating growing revenue over the past 3 years

Knife River Corporation had revenue growth in 5.00 out of 5 years, indicating consistent revenue performance

Knife River Corporation had positive ROE in 5.00 out of 5 years, indicating consistent and reliable returns on equity

Knife River Corporation has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

Knife River Corporation has an earnings yield of 3.23%, which is below the 4.00% threshold, indicating the stock may be expensive relative to its earnings

Knife River Corporation is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 40.36 based on EBITDA multiple model

Knife River Corporation has an EV/EBITDA ratio of 11.61x, which is below the 20.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its operating earnings

Knife River Corporation is undervalued relative to its fair value price of 93.19 based on Earnings Fair Value model

Knife River Corporation has no meaningful EPS growth rate; PEG ratio cannot be computed.

Knife River Corporation has a price-to-book ratio of 2.91x, which is below the 5.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its book value

Knife River Corporation has a price-to-sales ratio of 1.42x, which is below the 8.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its revenue