Lee Enterprises, Incorporated cash flow to debt ratio of -1.15% indicates that the company cannot generate enough cash to cover its debt over time. This level indicates weak financial health.

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated's free cash flow has increased -12.45% from $-8.09M last year to $-7.08M, signaling increasing performance

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated's debt to equity ratio is -87.23, signaling that the company spent its equity and risk bankruptcy.

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated's debt to equity ratio is -87.23, signaling that the company spent its equity and risk bankruptcy.

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated has a net debt to EBITDA ratio of 28.24x, which exceeds the 3.00x threshold, indicating high leverage and potential financial risk

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated's interest coverage ratio is 0.81, which means that the company struggles to meet interest obligations, signaling financial risk.

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated's profit margin has increased (-28.49%) in the last year from -4.23% to -3.02%, signaling increasing performance

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated's short-term liabilities of $113.36M exceed its short-term assets of $89.44M, signaling financial risk

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated's return on assets of 0.00% is lower than the 5.00% threshold, indicating inefficient asset utilization

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated's return on equity of 46.64%, is higher than 15.00%, indicating good performance

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated's operating cash flow is lower than its net income, indicating that earnings may not be fully backed by cash generation

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated had positive net income in only 1.00 out of 5 years, indicating unstable earnings

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated has negative free cash flow, indicating the company is burning cash rather than generating it

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated has negative free cash flow, indicating cash burn

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated's yearly earnings has decreased 45.46% since last year from $-25.84M to $-37.59M, signaling decreasing performance

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated's yearly revenue has decreased -8.02% since last year from $611.38M to $562.34M, signaling decreasing performance

ROIC 4.58% (Source: FMP key-metrics). Below the 5% partial-credit threshold. Score: 0 of 2. The 5% and 10% cutoffs anchor to typical US weighted-average cost of capital. Below 5% indicates the company is not generating returns above its likely cost of capital under this definition of invested capital. Invested capital here includes equity, non-current liabilities (pension obligations, deferred taxes, lease obligations), and short-term debt. Cash is not subtracted. Companies with substantial float, lease portfolios, or cash holdings will score lower under this definition than under narrower operating-capital definitions. See methodology.

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated's 3-year revenue CAGR of -10.37% is negative, indicating declining revenue over the past 3 years

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated had revenue growth in only 1.00 out of 5 years, indicating inconsistent revenue performance

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated had positive ROE in only 1.00 out of 5 years, indicating inconsistent returns on equity

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 0.00 based on EBITDA multiple model

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated has an EV/EBITDA ratio of 15.27x, which is below the 20.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its operating earnings

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated is undervalued relative to its fair value price of 27.90 based on Earnings Fair Value model

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated has negative shareholder equity; price-to-book is not meaningful and the check fails

Lee Enterprises, Incorporated has a price-to-sales ratio of 0.10x, which is below the 8.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its revenue