Phillips 66 cash flow to debt ratio of 21.69% indicates that the company cannot generate enough cash to cover its debt over time. This level indicates weak financial health.

Phillips 66's free cash flow has increased 17.02% from $2.33G last year to $2.73G, signaling increasing performance

Phillips 66's debt to equity ratio is 0.95, which means that the company's assets are unhealthy financed, signaling financial risk. READ MORE: A ratio over 0.60 means the company finances its assets with debt, signaling financial risk. If ratio is negative, the company spent its own equity and risks bankruptcy

Phillips 66's debt has increased relative to shareholder equity from 0.73 last year to 0.95 today, signaling weakened financials

Phillips 66 has a net debt to EBITDA ratio of 2.23x, which is below the 3.00x threshold, indicating healthy leverage and financial stability

Phillips 66's interest coverage ratio of 5.74 indicates that earnings with good margin can cover interest payments on company debt

Phillips 66's profit margin has increased (105.30%) in the last year from 1.48% to 3.04%, signaling increasing performance

Phillips 66's short-term assets of $17.27G exceed its short-term liabilities of $13.33G

Phillips 66's return on assets of 4.90% is lower than the 5.00% threshold, indicating inefficient asset utilization

Phillips 66's return on equity of 14.72%, is lower than 15.00%, indicating bad performance

Phillips 66's operating cash flow exceeds its net income, indicating high-quality earnings backed by actual cash generation

Phillips 66 had positive net income in 5.00 out of 5 years, indicating stable and consistent earnings

Phillips 66 has positive free cash flow, indicating the company generates cash after capital expenditures

Phillips 66 has a free cash flow yield of 3.97%, which is above the 2.00% threshold, indicating strong cash generation relative to market value

Phillips 66's yearly earnings has increased 107.98% since last year from $2.12G to $4.40G, signaling increasing performance

Phillips 66's yearly revenue has decreased -7.51% since last year from $143.12G to $132.38G, signaling decreasing performance

ROIC 7.78% (Source: FMP key-metrics). In the 5–10% partial-credit band. Score: 1 of 2. This band sits within the typical US weighted-average cost of capital range. Methodology choice can change the conclusion: under FMP's invested-capital definition the company is at or near its cost of capital; under narrower operating-capital definitions the same company may score higher. Invested capital here includes equity, non-current liabilities, and short-term debt. Cash is not subtracted. See methodology.

Phillips 66's 3-year revenue CAGR of -8.06% is negative, indicating declining revenue over the past 3 years

Phillips 66 had revenue growth in only 2.00 out of 5 years, indicating inconsistent revenue performance

Phillips 66 had positive ROE in 5.00 out of 5 years, indicating consistent and reliable returns on equity

Phillips 66 has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

Phillips 66 has an earnings yield of 5.97%, which is above the 4.00% threshold, indicating the stock offers reasonable value relative to its earnings

Phillips 66 is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 116.05 based on EBITDA multiple model

Phillips 66 has an EV/EBITDA ratio of 9.88x, which is below the 20.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its operating earnings

Phillips 66 is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 157.79 based on Earnings Fair Value model

Phillips 66 has a PEG-ratio under 1 which is considered undervalued

Phillips 66 has a price-to-book ratio of 2.42x, which is below the 5.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its book value

Phillips 66 has a price-to-sales ratio of 0.51x, which is below the 8.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its revenue